Onemillioncheckboxes – Navigating Human Nature, the NHS, and AI Futures

by Captain Walker

Categories: Humanities, Psychology & Philosophy, Technology

The craze surrounding the site Onemillioncheckboxes (OMCB) reflects an interesting intersection of collaborative and competitive online behaviour. The concept of one million checkboxes, initially designed to be checked off collectively, has evolved into a platform for users to express creativity, engage in community-driven projects, and even participate in virtual tug-of-war scenarios. The NHS could learn something here. Whether the masters of the NHS could actually learn and apply anything learned here is another matter.

Basically, the platform starts off as one million blank checkboxes and aims to get to 1 million all checked. But what’s happening when I engage, is that loads of people are trying to create patterns, drawings or messages that they think are meaningful by checking and unchecking boxes. So, for some blank rows or columns of boxes, when I check them, they are quickly unchecked and then it becomes a battle of wills. I’ll recheck them then others would uncheck them.

The people interacting up there are not in direct communication with each other. All they see is boxes checked and unchecked. There is no collaboration, coordination or organisation of their efforts to create patterns. They have all disregarded the main objective of reaching 1 million checked boxes and created individual objectives that they fancy.

Those who prefer to watch or listen to video can access that below.

Please accept YouTube cookies to play this video. By accepting you will be accessing content from YouTube, a service provided by an external third party.

YouTube privacy policy

If you accept this notice, your choice will be saved and the page will refresh.

Please accept YouTube cookies to play this video. By accepting you will be accessing content from YouTube, a service provided by an external third party.

YouTube privacy policy

If you accept this notice, your choice will be saved and the page will refresh.

What do ants know that humans don’t?

What it means

Imagine that on a typical day, one finds themselves in the midst of a bustling office, where each person contributes to a collective goal. The environment hums with the sound of keyboards clicking, phones ringing, and occasional bursts of laughter. This scene illustrates how productivity flourishes when human intelligence and creativity are harnessed through organisation, coordination, and control.

Imagine now a different scenario: a room filled with the same individuals, but without any structure. There are no assigned roles, no schedules, and no clear objectives. People move aimlessly, conversations overlap in a cacophony, and efforts dissipate into fragmented actions. This shift from productivity to chaos underscores the pivotal role of the three orchestrating factors.

Organisation sets the stage. In the office, it means defined roles, structured workflows, and clear goals. Each person knows their responsibilities, which directs their intelligence and creativity towards specific tasks. Without organisation, even the most brilliant ideas scatter like confetti in the wind, losing their potential impact.

Coordination acts as the conductor of this symphony. It ensures that each person’s efforts align, creating harmony rather than discord. Coordinated actions amplify individual contributions, turning isolated efforts into a cohesive force. In our chaotic room, the absence of coordination means that even well-meaning actions clash and counteract each other, leading to frustration and inefficiency.

Control, the third pillar, maintains the balance. It provides oversight, ensuring that the organisation’s structure and the coordination of efforts remain intact. Control does not mean stifling creativity; rather, it guides it, ensuring that innovations contribute to the collective aim rather than veering off into counterproductive directions.

These three factors are not just relevant in human settings but also crucial in the realm of artificial intelligence. Consider AI systems designed to emulate human behaviour. Without organisation, their actions may become disjointed. Without coordination, they might work at cross-purposes. Without control, they could amplify chaos, making decisions that disrupt rather than enhance human activities.

In platforms like Onemillioncheckboxes , the lack of direct communication and coordination among users mirrors this potential for chaos. The platform becomes a digital canvas of unchecked and checked boxes, where patterns emerge and dissolve in a seemingly random dance. This underscores how the absence of the three orchestrating factors leads to an environment where creativity and intelligence fail to translate into productivity. Thus, whether in human enterprises or AI systems, the harmony of organisation, coordination, and control transforms potential into productivity, while their absence turns potential into chaos.

Human nature

Collaborative creativity

The collaborative efforts seen on Onemillioncheckboxes showcase the inherent human drive towards creativity and community. When people come together to create patterns, drawings, and messages, it underscores our innate desire to express ourselves and to connect with others through shared experiences. This behaviour taps into several core aspects of human nature:

  • Collective Intelligence: Humans often achieve more together than individually. The pooling of ideas and efforts can lead to more complex and beautiful outcomes, illustrating the power of collaborative creativity.
  • Shared Goals and Purpose: Working towards a common goal, even something as simple as creating a pattern, fosters a sense of unity and purpose. This aligns with our evolutionary background, where cooperation was essential for survival.

Competitive interaction

The competitive interactions on the platform highlight another fundamental aspect of human nature: our competitive spirit and the desire to assert individual influence. The back-and-forth checking and unchecking of boxes reveal several key insights:

  • Assertion of Individual Will: The act of repeatedly checking and unchecking boxes can be seen as a microcosm of the struggle for control and dominance. This mirrors larger societal and personal interactions where individuals seek to impose their will or vision over others.
  • Conflict and Resolution: The dynamic also reflects our natural propensity for conflict and the subsequent efforts towards resolution. It showcases how humans can both compete and cooperate, often switching between the two modes fluidly.

Social dynamics

The interactions on Onemillioncheckboxes offer a snapshot of broader social dynamics, emphasizing aspects of human social behaviour:

  • Anonymity and Behaviour: The anonymity of the internet allows individuals to act in ways they might not in face-to-face interactions. This can lead to both positive expressions of creativity and negative competitive behaviours, reflecting the duality of human nature.
  • Emergent Behaviour: The platform illustrates how complex social behaviours can emerge from simple rules and interactions. It shows how order and patterns can arise spontaneously from the actions of many individuals, akin to social phenomena in the real world.

Community engagement

The sense of community engagement fostered by the platform highlights our intrinsic need for social connection and belonging:

  • Building Communities: Even in a virtual space with a simple premise, humans seek to form communities. This underscores our social nature and the importance of belonging and shared identity.
  • Communication and Interaction: The platform becomes a medium for communication, where the checking and unchecking of boxes can be seen as a form of dialogue or interaction, albeit in a non-verbal and symbolic manner.

Insights into human nature

The behaviours observed on Onemillioncheckboxes, in the absence of direct communication, provide rich insights into fundamental human nature:

  1. Inherent Creativity: Humans are inherently creative, finding ways to express themselves and create meaning even within constrained and seemingly simple environments.
  2. Desire for Autonomy: The competitive dynamics highlight a strong desire for autonomy and individual expression, with users seeking to assert their presence and influence.
  3. Complex Social Dynamics: Even without direct communication, complex social dynamics emerge, including mimicry, competition, and implicit coordination, reflecting the sophisticated nature of human social interactions.
  4. Adaptability and Goal Reorientation: The shift away from the original objective illustrates human adaptability and the tendency to prioritise engaging and immediate activities over abstract goals.
  5. Desire for Expression: Humans have an inherent need to express themselves, whether through art, communication, or action. This platform provides an outlet for that expression in a collective context.
  6. Interplay of Cooperation and Competition: The balance between cooperative and competitive behaviours is a core aspect of human interactions. This duality is evident in the patterns and dynamics on the platform.
  7. Social Connectivity: The need for social connection and community is deeply ingrained in us. Even simple, seemingly trivial platforms can fulfill this need and demonstrate the importance of social bonds.

Emergent creativity without direct communication

Despite the lack of direct communication, users collectively create patterns and messages, which underscores several aspects of human nature:

  1. Implicit Coordination: Even without explicit collaboration, humans have an ability to implicitly coordinate. The patterns that emerge are a result of individual actions aligning in ways that create a larger, coherent whole. This suggests an inherent capability for synchronisation and pattern recognition.
  2. Spontaneous Order: The emergence of order from seemingly random actions demonstrates our capacity to find and create meaning in our environment. This phenomenon aligns with the idea of emergent behaviour in complex systems, where simple interactions lead to complex patterns.

Competitive dynamics and the pursuit of individual expression

The competitive aspect, where users continuously check and uncheck boxes, highlights the following:

  1. Desire for Impact: Users are motivated by a desire to leave a mark or impact the shared space, reflecting a fundamental aspect of human nature—the need to be seen and to exert influence.
  2. Resistance to Conformity: The constant undoing of others’ actions indicates a resistance to conformity and a desire to assert individual will. This can be seen as a microcosm of larger societal behaviours where individuals strive to differentiate themselves.

Social behaviour in a constrained environment

The platform serves as a microcosm for social interaction, revealing insights into how humans behave within constrained environments:

  1. Mimicry and Influence: Users might mimic each other’s actions, leading to the propagation of certain patterns or behaviours. This mirrors social influence in larger contexts, where individuals are influenced by the actions and behaviours of others around them e.g. social media.
  2. Conflict and Resolution: The ongoing conflict of checking and unchecking boxes demonstrates our natural propensity for conflict, as well as the cyclical nature of resolution and renewed conflict. This reflects the broader human experience of continuous negotiation and re-negotiation of social boundaries.

Disregard for the initial objective

The collective disregard for the original objective of checking all one million boxes points to deeper behavioural insights:

  1. Shift of Purpose: The initial goal becomes secondary to the more engaging and immediate activity of creating patterns and engaging in competitive interactions. This suggests that humans are driven by immediate rewards and interactive engagement over abstract, long-term goals.
  2. Redefinition of Goals: The platform’s users have effectively redefined the purpose of the site. This adaptability reflects our ability to repurpose environments to fit our desires and motivations, showcasing flexibility in human goal-setting.

We are not ants

I’m now thinking that the common ant does not require the level of conscious collective control over their directed purposes e.g. building a nest or creating a bridge between two close branches on a tree. So this seems to mean that the very nature of our abilities that distinguishes us from ants, requires the conscious efforts of control, organisation, coordination etc. The instinctive collective behaviour of ants compared to humans, highlights an intriguing distinction between species that operate on programmed instincts and those driven by conscious, individual thought.

Ants operate through instinctual behaviours and simple communication methods, such as pheromones, which facilitate complex tasks like nest building or foraging without the need for conscious control or coordination. This instinct-driven approach leads to highly efficient and organised outcomes because:

  • Innate Roles: Each ant inherently knows its role within the colony, reducing the need for explicit communication and coordination.
  • Automatic Responses: Their behaviours are triggered by environmental cues and pheromones, ensuring seamless cooperation and immediate adaptation to changes.

In contrast, human abilities and societal structures necessitate conscious efforts in control, organisation, and coordination due to several key factors:

1. Individual Consciousness and Autonomy:

  • Unique Perspectives: Each human possesses individual thoughts, preferences, and interpretations, leading to a wide array of perspectives and approaches to problem-solving.
  • Autonomous Decision-Making: Unlike ants, humans make autonomous decisions, which can lead to both innovative solutions and potential conflicts in achieving collective goals.

2. Complex Communication and Negotiation:

  • Language and Dialogue: Humans rely on complex language and negotiation to coordinate actions and align objectives, a process that requires continuous effort and refinement.
  • Shared Understanding: Establishing a shared understanding and common goals among diverse individuals necessitates deliberate and ongoing communication.

3. Adaptability and Innovation:

  • Creative Problem-Solving: Human intelligence and creativity allow for innovative solutions and adaptability, but these also require conscious direction to be effective within a collective framework.
  • Dynamic Objectives: Unlike the relatively static goals of ant colonies, human societies have dynamic and evolving objectives that require continuous reassessment and reorganisation.

Implications for Human Organisations

Complex organisations such as the NHS could learn something here.

The interplay between individuality and collective goals within human organisations holds significant implications, particularly regarding the potential for chaos and how it may arise. Human organisations, such as the NHS, rely heavily on the effective organisation, coordination, and control of diverse individual contributions. Each member of an organisation brings unique perspectives, motivations, and talents, which, when aligned towards common objectives, can lead to remarkable achievements. However, the very nature of human individuality also introduces complexity and the potential for disarray.

Chaos within human organisations can emerge from several sources. One primary factor is the misalignment of individual goals with organisational objectives. When individuals pursue personal agendas that diverge from the collective mission, efforts can become fragmented, leading to inefficiencies and conflicts. This misalignment often arises from a lack of clear communication and shared vision, causing members to operate at cross-purposes.

Additionally, the absence of robust coordination mechanisms can exacerbate this potential for chaos. In organisations where roles and responsibilities are poorly defined, or where there is inadequate oversight, efforts can overlap or contradict, resulting in wasted resources and reduced effectiveness. Coordination ensures that individual actions are harmonised and directed towards the organisation’s goals, mitigating the risk of disjointed efforts.

The NHS, with its vast network of professionals and departments, exemplifies the challenges and importance of maintaining this balance. Instances where communication breaks down, or where systems fail to integrate individual contributions effectively, illustrate how quickly chaos can ensue. Patients may experience delays, professionals may face increased stress, and overall productivity can decline, highlighting the critical role of structured coordination and control.

Furthermore, the introduction of AI into human organisations presents both opportunities and challenges. AI systems, designed to enhance efficiency and decision-making, must be carefully integrated to avoid amplifying existing chaos. Without proper alignment with human values and organisational goals, AI could potentially disrupt workflows and introduce new layers of complexity. The balance between leveraging AI’s capabilities and maintaining human oversight is crucial to prevent the escalation of disarray.


  • Effort and Resources: Significant effort and resources are required to maintain organised and coordinated systems.
  • Potential for Conflict: Diverse perspectives and autonomy can lead to conflicts, requiring mechanisms for conflict resolution and alignment of goals.


  • Innovation and Progress: The conscious efforts put into coordination and organisation enable innovation, progress, and the ability to tackle complex and evolving challenges.
  • Enhanced Adaptability: Human societies can adapt to a wide range of environments and situations, thanks to their ability to consciously reassess and redirect efforts.

AI development

There must be concern about AI mimicking human behavioural patterns and potentially magnifying chaos. On platforms like Onemillioncheckboxes, where users engage in checking and unchecking boxes without direct communication, the resulting patterns and conflicts highlight aspects of human nature that could be problematic if replicated by AI. Without proper constraints, AI systems designed to emulate human behaviour might develop unpredictable and conflicting actions, leading to unintended consequences and inefficiencies. Ensuring robust goal alignment, incorporating conflict resolution mechanisms, maintaining human oversight, and developing ethical frameworks are essential strategies to mitigate these risks and harness the benefits of AI while preventing the amplification of chaos.

  • Instinctive vs. Conscious AI: AI systems can be designed to operate instinctively, following programmed behaviours, or more consciously, with the ability to adapt and innovate based on complex inputs and goals.
  • Balancing Efficiency and Flexibility: Striking a balance between efficiency (akin to ant-like behaviour) and flexibility (human-like conscious decision-making) is crucial in developing robust AI systems.

If AI developed our human patterns of individuality, our abilities to break or bend rules, we could be in serious trouble. I am not unpackign that

The Borg

In the Star Trek (Sci-Fi) universe, the Borg represent a collective consciousness where individuality is subsumed into a unified whole. This collective intelligence operates with the efficiency and single-mindedness of an ant colony, but with the advanced cognitive abilities of humans and machines combined. This concept integrates the strengths of both human and ant-like characteristics:

1. Unified Purpose and Efficiency:

  • Collective Goals: The Borg operate with a clear, unified purpose—assimilation and the pursuit of perfection. This singular focus eliminates the conflicts and inefficiencies that arise from individual autonomy.
  • Instinctive Coordination: Like ants, the Borg exhibit seamless coordination and organisation, automatically adapting to achieve their goals without the need for complex negotiation or individual decision-making.

2. Enhanced Intelligence and Adaptability:

  • Shared Knowledge: The collective nature of the Borg allows for the instant sharing of knowledge and skills across the entire collective, vastly enhancing their cognitive capabilities and adaptability.
  • Innovation through Assimilation: By assimilating diverse species and technologies, the Borg continuously evolve, incorporating new information and innovations into their collective intelligence.

The concept of the Borg raises intriguing implications and reflections on human nature and society:

Pros of a Collective Intelligence:

  • Efficiency and Coordination: A collective intelligence could achieve unparalleled efficiency and coordination, eliminating the frictions and delays inherent in individual-driven systems.
  • Rapid Adaptation and Learning: The ability to instantly share knowledge and skills could lead to rapid adaptation and continuous improvement, fostering a highly dynamic and resilient society.

Cons and Ethical Concerns:

  • Loss of Individuality: The subsumption of individuality raises significant ethical concerns, as personal autonomy, freedom, and diversity of thought are sacrificed for the collective.
  • Potential for Oppression: Such a system could easily become oppressive, with individual desires and rights overridden by the collective’s goals, leading to a loss of personal identity and self-determination.

Reflecting on the Borg concept provides valuable insights into the development of AI and collective intelligence systems:

Balancing Collective Efficiency and Individual Autonomy:

  • Hybrid Models: AI systems could be designed to combine the efficiency of collective intelligence with the preservation of individual autonomy, fostering both innovation and coordination without sacrificing personal freedoms.
  • Ethical Frameworks: Developing robust ethical frameworks is crucial to ensure that AI and collective intelligence systems enhance human welfare without compromising individual rights and values.

Leveraging Collective Knowledge:

  • Distributed Learning: AI can leverage distributed learning and knowledge-sharing techniques to enhance capabilities while maintaining individualised approaches tailored to specific contexts and needs.
  • Collaborative Intelligence: Promoting collaborative intelligence, where AI systems assist human decision-making and creativity rather than subsuming them, can strike a balance between collective benefits and individual contributions.


This exploration took me on a journey exploring the intricate balance between individual creativity and collective effort, beginning with the unique dynamics observed on the platform Onemillioncheckboxes. This platform, where users engage in checking and unchecking boxes without direct communication, provided a fascinating microcosm of human behaviour, highlighting the complexities of aligning individual actions towards a common goal.

At the heart of the exploration was recognition that human productivity thrives when intelligence and creativity are effectively organised, coordinated, and controlled. In environments such as the NHS, where the absence of these orchestrating factors can sometimes lead to chaos, we see the importance of structure and communication in harnessing individual contributions for collective benefit.

I delved into the nature of individuality, noting that humans inherently seek their own meanings and purposes. This quest for personal significance makes it challenging to focus collective intelligence and creativity without conscious efforts in organisation and coordination. Unlike the instinctive behaviours seen in ant colonies, where roles are clear and coordination is seamless, human societies require deliberate efforts to achieve similar levels of efficiency and order.

The comparison to ants underscored how these insects naturally achieve complex tasks like nest building through instinctive coordination and predefined roles. This efficiency contrasts sharply with human behaviour, where individual autonomy and diverse perspectives necessitate continuous negotiation and alignment of goals.

The capacity for chaos within human organisations underscores the necessity of clear communication, effective coordination, and robust control mechanisms. By recognising and addressing the sources of potential disarray, organisations can harness the diverse strengths of their members while steering towards cohesive and productive outcomes. This balance is essential not only for current operations but also for navigating the future integration of advanced technologies

The journey took me on an intriguing turn with the concept of ‘The Borg’ from Star Trek, a collective intelligence that merges the cognitive abilities of humans with the organisational efficiency of ants. The Borg exemplify a unified purpose and seamless coordination, operating with a singular focus that eliminates individual conflict and maximises efficiency. However, this model raises ethical concerns about the loss of individuality and personal autonomy, highlighting the potential dangers of subsuming individual identities into a collective consciousness.

Reflecting on these themes, I considered the implications for AI development. AI systems, if designed to mimic human behaviour, must navigate the same dualities of individual autonomy and collective efficiency. Striking a balance between these aspects is crucial to prevent the amplification of chaos and to harness the benefits of collective intelligence while preserving individual freedoms.

This exploraton brought out the delicate balance required to align individual creativity with collective goals. Whether in human organisations like the NHS or in the development of AI, the conscious efforts of organisation, coordination, and control are essential. By learning from the instinctive coordination of ants and the unified purpose of the Borg, while also considering the ethical implications, we can develop systems that enhance human productivity and innovation while safeguarding individuality and autonomy.

This journey through human behaviour, collective intelligence, and the potential of AI illustrates the complexities and opportunities of integrating diverse individual contributions into cohesive and efficient systems. The key lies in maintaining a balance that honours both the unique strengths of individuality and the powerful capabilities of collective effort.

Other posts that may interest you...

Thoughts for tomorrow

“No one wants to spend whole mornings in committees whose conclusions will never be noticed, or will be overruled.” –  Handy 1999 Attitude is “a mental and neural state of readiness to respond which is organised through experience and exerts a directive and/or dynamic influence on behaviour”. – Engel and Blackwell 1982

How difficult is a straight answer.

The following is a conversation with someone online. At the heart of this is that I only need a simple yes or no answer to very straight forward question. I felt like Jeremy Paxman The question is: “Is TxxxRxxx regulated by a financial authority of some sort?”  As you will see below I had to ... Read more

Conspiracy theory or conspiracy fact?

Let’s get down to business – ‘only conspiracy theorists like conspiracy theories.‘ That’s what I’m told. Those who are labelled as conspiracy theorists are labelled away and marginalised with a number of adjectives e.g. deranged, demented, fantasists, paranoid, delusional. And of course, the words ‘conspiracy theorist’ are enough to make, people to look away. Lots ... Read more

Contacts lists

A conversation yesterday 26th June 2021, got me thinking about this. By coincidence, I was in the process of weeding out junk-contacts from my contacts list. Someone – Person X –  asked me for contact details for an accountant which I had passed to them a few months ago. Why? Because a) they can’t find ... Read more

Continue reading

Reading ability of UK doctors could be stuck at UK Year 9

Well, I do spend time on forums as some know to wrestle with parts of human nature that some totally avoid. Today I am led to infer that the reading ability of doctors in some significant proportion could be stuck ...
Read article

Painting with Emotions: A Colourful Journey into Love

Love between two hearts is a symphony of feelings, a dance that transforms the world around us. This journey we embark upon explores the tender bonds between a man and a woman, though the essence of love’s beauty may resonate ...
Read article

The Throw-Away Person

In the canvas of human relationships, there exists a phenomenon that cuts to the core of our social nature – the experience of being a “throw away person”. This term describes individuals who find themselves unexpectedly and inexplicably cast aside ...
Read article